翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Sloppy Joe's
・ Sloppy Joe's Bar, Havana
・ Sloppy Meateaters
・ Sloppy Seconds
・ Sloppy seconds
・ Sloppy Seconds (album)
・ Sloppy seconds (sexual practice)
・ Sloppy Seconds Volume Two
・ Sloppy the Psychotic
・ Sloppy Thurston
・ Slopseller
・ Sloquet Hot Springs
・ Slosh dynamics
・ Sloshsat-FLEVO
・ Sloss
SLOSS debate
・ Sloss Furnaces
・ Sloss Mines
・ Sloss, California
・ Slossarczyk Crag
・ Slosson
・ Slossonia
・ Slostin machine gun
・ Sloswicke's Hospital
・ Slot
・ Slot (band)
・ Slot (computer architecture)
・ Slot (ice hockey)
・ Slot 1
・ Slot 2


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

SLOSS debate : ウィキペディア英語版
SLOSS debate
The SLOSS Debate was a debate in ecology and conservation biology during the 1970s and 1980s as to whether a single large or several small (SLOSS) reserves were a superior means of conserving biodiversity in a fragmented habitat.
In 1975 Jared Diamond suggested some "rules" for the design of protected areas, based on Robert MacArthur and E. O. Wilson's book ''The Theory of Island Biogeography''. One of his suggestions was that a single large reserve was preferable to several smaller reserves whose total areas were equal to the larger.
Since species richness increases with habitat area, a larger block of habitat would support more species than any of the smaller blocks. This idea was popularised by many other ecologists, and has been incorporated into most standard textbooks in conservation biology, and was used in real-world conservation planning. This idea was challenged by Wilson's former student Daniel Simberloff who pointed out that this idea relied on the assumption that smaller reserves had a ''nested'' species composition - it assumed that each larger reserve had all the species presented in any smaller reserve. If the smaller reserves had unshared species, then it was possible that two smaller reserves could have more species than a single large reserve.
Simberloff and Abele expanded their argument in subsequent paper in the journal ''The American Naturalist'' stating neither ecological theory nor empirical data exist to support the hypothesis that subdividing a nature reserve would increase extinction rates, basically negating Diamond as well as MacArthur and Wilson. Bruce A. Wilcox and Dennis D. Murphy responded to this paper in the same journal pointing out flaws in their argument while providing a comprehensive definition of habitat fragmentation. Wilcox and Murphy also argued that habitat fragmentation is probably the major threat to the loss of global biological diversity.
This helped set the stage for fragmentation research as an important area of conservation biology.〔Laurance, William F., and R.O. Bierregaard. 1997. Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management, and Conservation of Fragmented Communities. University of Chicago Press.〕 The SLOSS debate ensued as to the extent to which smaller reserves shared species with one another, leading to the development of ''nested subset theory'' by Bruce Patterson and Wirt Atmar in the 1980s and to the establishment of the Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project (BDFFP) near Manaus, Brazil in 1979 by Thomas Lovejoy and Richard Bierregaard.
== See also ==

* Island biogeography
* Patch dynamics

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「SLOSS debate」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.